The Knesset Finance Committee’s legal adviser warns that the committee’s votes last night to approve three budget requests were held in violation of procedure and therefore invalid, Haaretz reports, as the coalition works to fast-track a spate of transfers before the Knesset dissolves Friday ahead of the October 27 election.
In a biting letter to Finance Committee chairman Likud MK Hanoch Milwidsky, Shlomit Erlich details the three budget requests from the Finance Ministry that were approved, claiming each is marred by legal deficiencies and therefore must be voted on a second time.
She notes that Milwidsky himself told committee members last night that votes would not be held on the requests, but went forth with them regardless. The about-face angered opposition lawmakers, who left the meeting room in protest.
“Your intentional violation of the committee’s procedure, harming the committee members’ ability to participate time and time again over the past week, their ability to study and delve into the budget transfers, as well as the the legal counsel’s ability to address them, is causing significant harm to the committee’s work,” Erlich tells Milwidsky.
“If you wish to bring the request to a vote, it is necessary to correct the defects that arose as mentioned, and to hold the discussion again,” she writes.
Per the letter, published by Haaretz, the Finance Ministry sent one of the requests, concerning coalition funds, close to 11 p.m. last night. It was voted on and passed, despite a provision requiring all requests be sent a minimum of two days before a vote is held.
The request moreover lacked essential information including a legal opinion, the relevant government decision and details, she claims, concluding that the vote was an “unprecendented departure from the committee procedure.”
She notes that another request to allocate some NIS 970.9 million ($321 million) to the government’s regional grants program, meant to boost cities and localities marked for investment, went above and beyond the NIS 67.6 million ($22 million) provided for in the budget, and had not been subject to a legal review.
The third request, concerning budget allocations to two separate programs totaling NIS 1 million ($300,000) and NIS 400,000 ($133,000) respectively, was approved without her legal review and lacked necessary details, she says.